Court of Appeal
-
Moore-Bick, Richards and Kitchin LJJ
Town and country planning Green belt
-
Europa Oil & Gas Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and others
Planning permission – Mineral extraction – Green belt – Respondent company seeking planning permission to develop site for exploratory drilling for oil and gas – Appellant action group opposing that…
-
Westminster City Council v Dwyer
Easements – Abandonment – Right of way – Right of way existing over passageway for benefit of land owned by local authority on which residential development later constructed – Market…
-
Donovan and another v Rana and another
Easements – Implication – Utilities – Right of way granted in favour of residential property for all purposes connected with use and enjoyment of that property – Grant contained in…
-
Joyce v Darby & Darby (a firm)
Professional negligence Solicitor
-
Joyce v Darby & Darby (a firm)
Professional negligence – Causation – Quantum – Respondent instructing appellant firm of solicitors to act on purchase of residential property – Appellant failing to advise on existence of covenant against…
-
Northumbrian Water Ltd v Sir Robert McAlpine Ltd
Nuisance – Liability – Damage – Respondent redeveloping urban site – Shafts drilled and filled with concrete to create piles to support new building – Concrete escaping into old private…
-
Newham London Borough Council v Ali and others
Town and country planning – Unilateral undertaking – Enforcement – Section 106 of Town and Country Planning Act 1990 – Appellants giving unilateral undertaking under section 106 in connection with…
-
Marks & Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Co (Jersey) Ltd
Landlord and tenant Break clause
-
Church Commissioners for England v Hampshire County Council
Commons registration Village green
-
Ahmed v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Town and country planning Planning appeal
-
Davies and another v Davies
Proprietary estoppel – Reliance – Detriment – Judge finding that respondent entitled to beneficial interest in appellant parents’ farm by proprietary estoppel – Order corrected to declare that respondent having…