Agricultural Holdings Act 1948, section 2–Appeal from decision of county court judge that the proviso to section 2(1) applied to agreement–Whether a ‘grass keep’ agreement within proviso or a deemed…
Milk quota — Outgoer — Surrender of tenancy — Absence of compensation — ‘Lacuna’ of two years between 1984 and 1986 — No statutory scheme in the United Kingdom –…
Agricultural Holdings Act 1986 — Notice to quit — Case B in Schedule 3 to the 1986 Act — Landlord’s right to recover part of the holding for a non-agricultural…
Agricultural Holdings Act 1948, proviso to section 2(1)–‘Use of the land only for grazing or mowing during some specified period of the year’–Licence for grazing–Effect of later agreement for stabling…
Agricultural holdings — Yearly tenancy expressed to commence on September 29 — Whether notice to quit and deliver up possession on September 28 valid
Agricultural holdings — Compensation to outgoing tenant for loss of milk quota — Calculation of tenant’s fraction — Whether actual rent or open market rental value to be used in…
Agricultural holdings — Appeal by landlords by case stated from ruling of agricultural land tribunal — Notice to quit served by landlord within a year of serving a previous notice…
Agricultural holdings — Arbitrator’s award — Appeal against decision of county court judge that award should be set aside — Complaint that arbitrator was guilty of misconduct in refusing to…
Milk quotas — High Court decision on transfer of quotas following division of a holding — Arbitration under Dairy Produce Quotas Regulations 1984 — Appeal under section 1(3) of Arbitration…
Agricultural holdings — Agricultural Holdings Act 1986 — Grant of six months’ term — Deemed yearly tenancy — Whether yearly tenancy took effect from date of agreement or expiration of…
Agricultural holdings — Whether agreement conferred exclusive possession — Whether an agricultural tenancy created
Agricultural holdings — Death of sole surviving tenant — Case G in Schedule 3 to Agricultural Holdings Act 1986 — Whether notice to quit relying on Case G was valid…