Counter-Inflation Act 1973 and orders — End of standstill on business rents — Dispute as to amount of rent payable for a period of 14 months affected by the provisions…
Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 — Renewal of lease opposed on ground (f) of section 30(1) — Conditional conservation area consent — Whether landlord had intention to carry out demolition…
Landlord and tenant — Rent review clause — Principles restated by Court of Appeal — Decision of Peter Gibson J reversed — A simple correlation between rent review clause and…
Landlord and tenant — Arbitration Act 1979 — Challenge to award of arbitrators determining the market rent under a rent review clause of a lease of a ‘destination restaurant’ in122…
Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, section 30(1)(f) — Whether landlord’s intention to carry out development had been established — Landlord had opposed the grant of a new tenancy to the…
Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, Part II — Application for new tenancy — Landlords’ application for interim rent under section 24A — Building at end of its useful life subject…
Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, Part II–Preliminary issue on point of law–Whether grant of a right-of-way for a term of years is a tenancy to which Part II applies–Whether a…
Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, Part II — Appeal by tenant from decision of county court judge refusing a grant of a new tenancy — Appellant occupied a house from…
Landlord and Tenant Act 1954–Application by club for a new tenancy–Application opposed by landlord on ground of intention to occupy holding for purposes of business–Landlord’s undertaking to use land only…
Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, Part II — Terms of new tenancy — Questions as to interim rent under section 24A of Act — Landlords’ appeal from part of decision…
Landlord and tenant — Rent review clause in lease — Whether letter from tenants in response to landlords’ trigger notice was a valid counternotice — Whether counternotice must be ‘clear’…
Negligence — Mortgage loan valuation — Whether defendants’ negligent valuation caused damage — Whether plaintiffs contributorily negligent