Right to manage
-
OM Ltd v New River Head RTM Co Ltd
Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 – Right to manage (RTM) – Section 94 of Act – Right of respondent RTM company to be paid any accrued uncommitted service charges…
-
Moskovitz and others v 75 Worple Road RTM Co Ltd
Landlord and tenant – Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 – Right to manage – Respondent RTM company applying to acquire such right – Respondent’s claim notice sent to appellant…
-
OM Ltd v New River Head RTM Co Ltd
Landlord and tenant – Right to manage
-
Moskovitz and others v 75 Worple Road RTM Co Ltd
Landlord and tenant, Right to manage
-
Re Stanhope Castle RTM Co Ltd’s application
Right to manage – Qualifying premises
-
Connaught Court RTM Co Ltd v Abouzaki Holdings Ltd
Right to manage – Premises in mixed use – Chapter I of Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 – Para 1 of Schedule 6 – Leasehold valuation tribunal finding right…
-
Southall Court (Residents) Ltd and others v Buy Your Freehold Ltd and others
Right to manage – Section 79(5) of Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 – Sections 22 and 352 of Companies Act 1985 – Right to manage (RTM) company giving notice…
-
Southall Court (Residents) Ltd and others v Buy Your Freehold Ltd and others
DECISION 1. These are two consolidated appeals arising from determinations of the LVT on respectively 15 and 24 July 2007.
-
Plintal SA and another v 36-48A Edgewood Drive RTM and another
Right to manage – Claim notices – Counternotices sent by appellants’ authorised agents –Appellants disputing effectiveness of service of claim notices – Respondents accepting that contention but continuing application for…
-
Plintal SA and another v 36-48A Edgewood Drive RTM and another
Right to manage, Costs
-
PP 2007/69
The decision in Holding & Management (Solitaire) Ltd v 1-16 Finland Street RTM Co Ltd [2007] PLSCS 214 creates new law.