Practice point
-
PP 2002/223
Q According to the lease of our shop, the landlord cannot unreasonably withhold his consent to a proposed assignment or subletting.
-
PP 2002/221
Time limit for referring rent increase to rent assessment committee. Assured tenants who leave it until the last minute to refer a landlord’s notice of increase to a rent assessment…
-
PP 2002/220
Discrimination against homosexuals: property law implications of Godin-Mendoza v Ghaidan [2002] 46 EG 197 (CS). Q I gather from the Godin-Mendoza decision of the Court of Appeal, as explained in…
-
PP 2002/219
Standard contract conditions can be injurious to health. One of the ways in which a land owner can shoot himself in the foot is to sell off part of his…
-
PP 2002/218
Developers cannot afford to ignore public law issues. Local amenity groups and vociferous individuals can no longer be treated as harmless pests buzzing around the heads of developers.
-
PP 2002/216
It no longer comes as a surprise to read of a human rights issue being raised in a property law dispute.
-
PP 2002/215
Some much needed learning on recreational rights . Along with the Suez Crisis and the birth of rock and roll, 1956 saw the landmark decision of the Court of Appeal…
-
PP 2002/212
A review of recent decisions. If you are responsible for the collection of service charges from business tenants, then, sooner or later, you may be faced with a claim that:.
-
PP 2002/211
Thrashing out terms on statutory renewal – a hand over from judge to expert. Proceedings taken under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 have reached the stage where the only…
-
PP 2002/210
ENE – smoothing the way to dispute resolution. A party to a dispute seeks the opinion of counsel, or, possibly, the views of a surveyor or medical specialist.
-
PP 2002/208
Entitlement to challenge planning permission. Q A group of local OAPs, who simply like things the way they are, are planning to challenge a decision in favour of our industrial…