Practice point
-
PP 2002/11
On learning that a sale of land has been “completed”, you would normally assume that the entire purchase price has been paid over.
-
PP 2002/14
Landlords minded to levy distress should take the greatest care to ensure that the tenant is in no position to assert a set-off — a danger now greatly increased by…
-
PP 2002/6
Q We are about to apply for consent for a residential development. The only foreseeable snag is our need to acquire access over an adjacent site so that we can…
-
PP 2002/5
By sections 31 and 36 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, “general policies” and “detailed policies” must respectively be included in the structure plan and the local plan.
-
PP 2002/3
Where a person (A) asserts an overriding interest against a purchaser (P) of registered land, and does so on the basis of his “actual occupation” at the material time, he…
-
PP 2002/9
An alleged interference with a right of way, or other easement, is not actionable unless it can be fairly described as “substantial”.
-
PP 2002/10
“But the implications usually explained by the maxim that no one can derogate from his own grant do not stop short with easements.
-
PP 2002/1
L lends £1m to B on the security of Whiteacre, which has been professionally valued by V (engaged by L) at £1.2m.
-
PP 2001/56
Q As a surveyor mainly concerned with residential properties, my attention was naturally drawn to Farley v Skinner [2001] 48 EG 131 and [2001] 49 EG 120, where the House…
-
PP 2001/63
Q In preparation for a change of use, for which there is a deemed permission under the 1995 General Permitted Development Order, we are about to carry out extensive interior…
-
PP 2001/61
At a theoretical level, no distinction should be drawn between residential and commercial premises when it comes to deciding whether a paying occupier enjoys a lease or a mere licence.