Welcome to your weekly round-up of the pick of the content published on EG Legal over the past seven days.
This week, we have a review of where things stand when it comes to the rollout of electric vehicle charging infrastructure, including building regulations that will make charging points a requirement in certain types of buildings.
In addition, part three of our Clause for Thought series covers break clauses, while our latest On the Case podcast analyses the recent Supreme Court decision on the right to manage and payment of service costs on large estates. Other topics covered below range from mines and minerals to legal developments in Wales.
Legal news
On the Case: The Supreme Court on RTM and estate service charges in FirstPort
LISTEN James Souter and Lauren Fraser discuss a case involving the right to manage and service costs
Leeds City Council told to reconsider designating sports field a community asset
Campaigners have been pressing the council since 2020
Housebuilder Hyde allowed to expand post-Grenfell cladding claim
Contractor Mulalley argued the claim was being modified out-of-time
Director of landbanking scheme escapes disqualification
Asset Land Investment was ordered to repay investors £21m in 2016
Legal features
Charging infrastructure: revving up for EV change
Amy Allen reflects on the latest announcements regarding electric vehicle charging infrastructure
Clause for thought and take a break
In the third part of EG’s series on clauses in commercial leases, Alison Murrin puts the focus on break clauses
Return of deposits
Mark Pawlowski considers the court’s discretionary power to order the return of a deposit
What’s on the horizon for property law in Wales?
Sian Skerratt-Williams looks ahead at some of the developments in Welsh real estate-related law
Validity of notices – where are we now?
Nicola Muir and Anna Phillips take a look at the complex statutory provisions in RTM and enfranchisement legislation
Mines and minerals: unexpected implications for unsuspecting landowners
Kevin Lee assesses the murky legal landscape surrounding underground mines and minerals
Legal note: Simplifying complicated pleadings using extrapolation
Stuart Pemble considers the recent approval of a claimant pleading its case on an extrapolated basis
Practice points
External cladding: relying on limitation as shield to claim of non-compliance
Mullaley & Co Ltd v Martlet Homes Ltd
Property ownership: creation of a charitable trust requires intention to do so
London Borough of Brent v Johnson and others
Business rates: court sees through sham licence agreements
Queen Street Properties Ltd and another v Cardiff City and County Council
Case summaries
Mulalley & Co Ltd v Martlet Homes Ltd
Practice and procedure – Particulars of claim – Amendment
Queen Street Properties Ltd and another v Cardiff City and County Council
Rating – Non-domestic rates – Sham
Ali v Dinc and another
Real property – Equitable proprietary interest – Trust
Brent London Borough Council v Johnson
Property – beneficial interest – Charitable trust
EE Ltd and another v Affinity Water Ltd
Telecommunications – Electronic Communications Code – Consideration and compensation
For more legal articles and to search our extensive archive, visit EG Legal
To send feedback, e-mail jess.harrold@eg.co.uk or tweet @EGPropertyNews